Which Is Better For Making Apps: A Hybrid App Or A Native App In 2024?

Mobile apps are flexible work tools. These days, they are the usual way to connect with customers for everyday things like shopping, banking, fun, and more. Users want quick and easy experiences, and mobile apps give them both. With new apps coming out all the time, it's clear that businesses count on them more than ever. Because of this, the business of making mobile apps is growing, and 299 billion apps will be downloaded.

Though it might seem like a good idea, making a mobile app for your business can be very bad for it and cause a lot of problems. Let's look at the "native vs. Think about the difference between "native vs. cross-platform." If you can only make one app, is that better? Or are apps that work on more than one device more useful?

A lot of important things affect the choice, and this blog post will go into more detail about those things. Now that you know the difference between a native app and a mix app, you can choose the best way to build your app.

What are Native Apps Development?


Native app development company, means making apps that work on a certain mobile operating system. For example, for Android, you would use Java, and for iOS, you would use Swift or Objective-C. The app was made in a safe environment that followed all the technical guidelines and user experience rules of each OS. It makes things run faster and gives you a better experience.

In this case, "experience" refers to how other native apps on that device look and feel. This could help the end user learn how to use the app and get around it much faster.

Besides that, native apps also have some benefits. The device's features, like the address book, GPS, camera, and more, are easy to get to and use. It means that the app is built into the OS. So, these are made based on certain rules.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Native Apps

The time has come to consider the pros and cons of developing native mobile apps so that you can make an informed decision.

Advantages of Native Apps

A native app is basically a better version of the usual app for the operating system, so it looks and feels like other apps you've used before. This similarity can make things easier for the user.

Native apps usually start faster because they were made to work with that platform. They made the app's pictures and images better by keeping the aspect ratio.

You can use them without being linked to the Internet (most of the time) because they work better when they're not. Users can still access the most important parts of your app even if they are stuck in the middle of nowhere, like on a bus or the subway.

Code written in C++ is still faster than HTML and JavaScript. For this reason, native apps work really well for apps that have a lot of images, HD games, and animations.

Disadvantages of Native Apps

Most of the time, downloading native mobile apps takes longer. People have to go to the app store, find the app, start it, agree to the terms and conditions, and then download it. People who might buy may give up on the file in the middle if it takes too long.

Native app development company costs go up in the long run because different native app developers with different skill sets are needed to make, support, and run the same app on each platform.

It's almost never easy or quick to make sure that all systems get the same feature at the same time. This is because native mobile apps have their own set of code.

Examples of Native App Development

What are Hybrid Apps Development?


The website is the main focus of hybrid app development company. They might look like any other native app, but they come from a company's website. Hybrid apps are web apps that are made with JavaScript and HTML and are contained within a native app container. Most of the info on that page loads as users move through the app.

But unlike most web apps, hybrid mobile apps can use native tools to do things that native apps can do without having to write any extra code. It will only take one build for your app to be able to use the camera, file storage, and security tools like Face ID or fingerprint recognition. Read the guide on native app vs. mixed app vs. use a web app to get a better idea.

A hybrid app also costs less to make and keep up to date than a native app because its makers use the "write once, run anywhere" method.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Hybrid Apps

The development of hybrid apps comes with its own set of benefits and drawbacks, just like native app development does. Okay, let's take a look at them like this:

Advantages of Hybrid Apps

When you need to make more than one version of an app, hybrid apps can save you time and money by having a "one for all" build.

There is no need for users to switch between websites, devices, or operating systems when using hybrid app development. The user experience is the same on all platforms, for better or worse.

All systems use the same code base, so people who make mixed apps only have to write it once and run it when they need to. There are native apps for each platform that need to be built, updated, and written separately.

It is possible for hybrid apps to get the same speed boosts from hardware as native apps. Since native apps can do the same thing, this isn't really an "advantage," but it is something to keep in mind.

Disadvantages of Hybrid Apps

There are many apps that work the same whether they are mixed or native. Games in HD and 3D, software with graphics that use a lot of data, and other performance-based apps, on the other hand, could not work properly or regularly in hybrid app form.

Because mix apps are what they are, each user will have a different experience with them. You can tell this by what kind of software and operating system they are using and what version it is. There will need to be a lot more tests to stop this.

For hybrid apps to work, they need to use native features. As a native app, a completely new device feature might not always be easy to get to. While a skilled worker could make their own, it would add to the work and stress of the development process.

Examples of Hybrid App

Different Brands Already Working With Hybrid Native


Many well-known brands are already using Hybrid Native to meet their specific needs, showing how important it has become in the market.These are some of the apps that were made with Hybrid Native:


Facebook wanted to bring all the good things about web development to mobile, like quick changes and only needing one team, and make the experience smoother for users. That's why they made open-source Hybrid Native.


With less time and money, Walmart wanted to make their app work better and give customers a better experience on both Android and iOS. So, they spent money on Hybrid Native application development company. This allowed them to reuse 96% of the coding across both platforms, giving them an edge in the market.


Bloomberg is another company that put money into making Hybrid Native apps. Bloomberg's team says they moved to Hybrid Native to keep their consumer mobile app up to date and in the market.


The SoundCloud app is another one that was made with Hybrid Native.

When SoundCloud tried to make an iOS version of their app, they ran into a lot of problems. The company wanted to make an app for both iOS and Android, but they couldn't find the right team. They can easily release their app on both platforms with the hybrid native platform, and they don't even need to hire a mobile app creator.


Wix wants people to be able to make their own HTML5 and mobile websites with just a few clicks of the mouse, even if they don't know how to code. They thought Hybrid Native fit best with their ideas because it had features like hot restart, faster development, and the flexibility of web development along with native results. Their development team says that Hybrid Native helped them speed up the creation process by 300%.

Not only have these well-known names tried Hybrid Native, but so have we at Clickbox Creative Marketing Agency

Key Difference Between Hybrid and Native App

Most people who download apps from the Apple App Store or Google Play Store don't know the difference between a mix app and a native app, and to be honest, they don't care. The end result is all that matters to them, which is an app that works well and responds to touch screens for either Android or iOS.

Native Apps

  • Involves mobile OS
  • Faster navigation
  • Best performance
  • High security
  • Highly responsive user interface
  • Access to native APIs

Hybrid Apps

  • Website focused
  • Less time to market
  • One source code
  • Runs on multiple platforms
  • No update required

But how you reach this goal is important to your company, and understanding the difference between native and mixed apps will help you make the right choice. Using the table below as a guide, let's look at a number of factors that show why one development method is better than the other:

Development Time: Native App vs Hybrid App

A company might start the mobile app development stages because they want to stay ahead of the competition or because they see a business chance. No matter what the reason is, officials want to get the app out as soon as possible. But things that are done quickly might not be as good as they could be. When making an app, you can use either native or hybrid app development company. It's important to know how each works and what the case is.

If a business can wait a few months to build and release an app, the native app development method is the best choice. without a doubt work very well and provide the best level of security.

When a business needs to start and use an app almost right away, hybrid mobile app development is the best choice. Hybrid apps are made from a single source code and made available on more than one device. Making mix apps also takes less time and work than making native apps.

App Performance: Native vs Hybrid Mobile App

Out of the two types of apps, native apps are much faster because they work directly with the OS. It takes longer for hybrid apps to run because they use a native wrapper.

On the other hand, with a mixed app, only the wrapper is downloaded to the phone, which may or may not include the important navigational parts. A lot of the info comes straight from the server.

But there are two things that can slow down an app: server requests (how many people are calling the same server at the same time) and load balance requests (where the requests are coming from and if there is a specific server). In spite of everything, experts say that hybrid apps are slow.

User Experience: Native vs Hybrid App

In contrast to the past, mobile app development today is mostly about how the user feels. It's important to make an app that doesn't look like any other app. It can be stressful to do things that seem hard.

Remember that people have had a hard time getting used to their phones. The last thing they want is an odd app with functions that don't make sense now that they know how to use their devices. They want the apps, motions, interactions, and visual cues to be perfectly in line with the style guide for the platform.

The user experience of a mobile app is so important that customers would not like an app. Some people might not use the app again very often. Some users might leave and rate another app on their phone poorly.

If you want to know how to choose between hybrid and native apps based on user experience, this is very important information.

IOS and Android have their own native apps. As soon as a company starts making a new app, the user experience for that app becomes very important.

When a mixed app is released, the platform shouldn't matter. One UI, one code base, and easy to build means it takes less time to get to market.

The only cost is the user experience. It's possible for even the best user experience architect to fail to make a mobile game that works on both Android and iOS. When it comes to tactical issues, both OS have different style standards.

Why is Hybrid Native a Better Option for Startups


To make things clearer, we'll talk about some of the problems that startups face when they try to make mobile apps and how this technology might be the best way to solve them.

1. No Target Audience

Because they are new, a lot of startups don't know which customers and markets to focus on to get the best return on investment (ROI).The question of "Comparing Android vs iOS, which mobile operating system is better for start-up mobile businesses?" is still being asked by everyone. They are concerned that if they select the incorrect platform, their customers would not be able to make use of the applications that they have developed.

They don't have to answer this question because Facebook's Hybrid Native lets them target both platforms at the same time.

2. Put in more effort

A lot of new businesses that don't know much about technology fail to hire two separate teams to make their app work on both Android and iOS at the same time. They have to work harder on the hiring process, which makes it hard for them to pay attention to other things that are more important.

Hybrid Native app development is the best way for this company to solve its problem because it gets rid of the need for two separate teams.

3. Not Enough Money

Creating a hybrid native app is less expensive than making a native mobile app. This helps new businesses get into the mobile market even if they don't have a lot of money.

4. The Launching Problem

Startups have to figure out when and how to launch a mobile app on both Android and iOS in order to make more money as the market gets more competitive. In this case, Hybrid Native lets them get a mobile app out on both platforms as soon as possible.

We saw that Hybrid Native helps startups in the right way and offers a lot of options. But if you're still not sure if you should use Hybrid Native or not, these use cases might help.

Pros and Cons of Hybrid and Native App:

Provide you with a list of pros and cons for both Hybrid Native and Native app development.

Hybrid Native:


Cross-Platform Development: Allows you to build applications for both iOS and Android using a single codebase, reducing development time and effort.

Code Reusability: A significant portion of the code can be shared between iOS and Android, leading to faster development cycles and reduced maintenance overhead.

JavaScript-Based: Hybrid Native uses JavaScript, a widely-used and accessible programming language, making it easier for developers to transition into mobile app development.

Large Community and Ecosystem: A large and active community of developers means there's a wealth of resources, libraries, and tools available, which can accelerate development.

Hot Reloading: Supports hot reloading, allowing developers to see the results of code changes in real-time without having to rebuild the entire application, which speeds up the development process.

Performance: Provides high performance by using native components and optimizing performance-critical parts of the app.

Flexibility and Customization: Allows a high level of customization, enabling developers to build highly interactive and feature-rich applications.

Backed by Facebook: Hybrid Native is maintained and supported by Facebook, benefiting from the resources and expertise of a major technology company.


Limited Access to Native APIs: Some advanced or specialized device features may require the use of native modules, which means writing code in the platform's native language.

Platform Differences: While Hybrid Native tries to abstract away platform differences, there may still be cases where platform-specific code is necessary.

Performance Bottlenecks: In certain scenarios, complex animations or performance-intensive tasks might not perform as well as fully native solutions.

Native App Development:


Optimal Performance: Native apps offer the best performance as they are developed specifically for a particular platform.

Full Access to Device APIs:Native apps have complete access to the device's hardware and APIs, allowing for maximum functionality.

Platform-Specific Features: Easier integration of platform-specific features and capabilities. Better User Experience: Native apps can provide a more seamless and integrated user experience with the platform.


Double Development Effort: Building separate apps for iOS and Android requires more time and resources compared to cross-platform solutions.

Learning Curve: Developers may need to learn platform-specific languages and tools (Swift/Objective-C for iOS, Java/Kotlin for Android).

Maintenance Overhead: Two separate codebases mean potentially more effort for maintenance, updates, and bug fixes.

Longer Development Time:Developing for both platforms can take longer than using a cross-platform framework.

The choice between React Native and Native app development depends on factors like project requirements, team expertise, and development timeline. Both approaches have their strengths and can be the right choice depending on the specific needs of the project.

When Should You Choose Native Apps?

Choose native app development when you are experiencing:

  • There is a lot of competition in your niche, so having slightly better success is helpful.
  • Your whole service works on phones, or you want your app to be a business in and of itself.
  • The app has complicated graphics and a lot of different ways to use it.
  • Your app needs to have a lot of features and be very complicated.
  • The app needs to be able to work without an internet connection, and you need to have long-term plans for growing.
  • When Should You Choose Hybrid Apps?

    When it comes to creating apps, hybrid apps are the way to go when:

  • You need to quickly test an idea for an app and put it on the market.
  • You need a cheap app that works on many devices.
  • There aren't a lot of complicated parts or rules that make sense.
  • Your startup needs to make an MVP fast.
  • The Internet is where the data in your app needs to come from.
  • Conclusions Regarding Native Apps and Hybrid Apps

    The development of native apps and hybrid apps each have their own advantages and disadvantages. However, the native strategy provides the organization with a greater number of benefits.

    Nevertheless, hybrid applications have a significant drawback, which is that the company would wind up spending more time refining and updating the app as a result of customer complaints about the user interface (UI) elements or problems linked to the performance of the app.

    On the other hand, native app capabilities are designed specifically for its operating system. In a similar vein, the native development strategy provides enhanced safety for mobile applications, user interfaces that are very responsive, improved performance, and access to native application programming interfaces.

    And despite the fact that there is a greater initial investment required, native apps can help organizations save both money and time. In addition to that, both the performance and the experience for users are outstanding. You can form a partnership with a specialized mobile app development services provider such as Clickbox Creative Marketing Agency to get assistance in selecting the most effective business solution for your needs. We have unmatched capabilities in the construction of trustworthy and powerful mobile applications. Let's talk about the prerequisites for your product's development.

    John Click

    Digital Marketer | SEO Copywriter | Content Strategist

    Experienced digital marketer with a proven track record in creating compelling content that not only engages audiences but also drives conversions and enhances SEO visibility. My expertise extends beyond marketing strategy to crafting persuasive narratives that resonate with your target audience. I combine data-driven strategies with captivating writing to deliver measurable results, ensuring your brand shines in the digital landscape.

    Questions? We're Here To Help.
    Send Us A Message!

    Stay Engaged With Our Content




    Chat With Us